The Saga of the Serbian Banking Market Consolidation

July 18, 2018

The Saga of the Serbian Banking Market Consolidation

July 18, 2018

Miloš Velimirović

Miloš Velimirović

Partner

It is possible that Société Générale will leave Serbian banking market by this year. The question now is how will this affect Serbian financial market? What will happen in the field of investments? 

Who’s leaving, and who are expanding? Société Générale’s most likely departure from Serbia is not going to be the only major news on the Serbian banking market this year. The answer to the question who will stay and who will expand its business depends on the business conditions in Serbia.

Are Big Banks Leaving The Serbian Market

Yet, in terms of the market’s size, this one is not the sole reason in determining the global strategies of international banking groups. The news thatSociété Générale is leaving Serbia marked the first half of 2018. This opened the question: what are the reasons for such a decision? To have a better perspective on the Serbian market, one must see the bigger picture. Out of the ten World’s biggest banks, the only one that is currently present in the Serbian market is the Bank of China. When it comes to the ten biggest banks in Europe, the only two that operate in Serbia are Crédit Agricole and Société Générale.

For a clearer view of the size of the Serbian market, it is important to be aware of the data below:

Top 10 global banking groups, by assets

(Total assets, billions of $)

1. Industrial and Commercial Bank of China 3,473
2. China Construction Bank Corporation 3,016
3. Agricultural Bank of China 2,816
4. Bank of China 2,604
5. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group 2,560
6. JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2,491
7. HSBC Holdings PLC 2,374
8. BNP Paribas 2,190
9. Bank of America 2,188
10. Wells Fargo & Co. 1,930

Top 10 European banking groups, by assets (billions of $)

1. HSBC Holdings 2,374
2. BNP Paribas 2,190
3. Credit Agricole Group 1,929
4. Deutsche Bank 1,792
5. Banco Santander 1,651
6. Société Générale’s 1,542
7. Barclays 1,476
8. Groupe BPCE 1,414
9. Lloyds Banking Group 1,059
10. Royal Bank of Scotland 1,018

Source: Statista 2018

Top 10 Serbian banking groups, by assets and market share (millions of EUR)

1. Intesa 4,678 16,8%
2. Komercijalna 3,116 11,0%
3. UniCredit 3,062 10,8%
4. Société Générale 2,431 8,5%
5. Raiffeisen 2,234 7,9%
6. AIK 1,767 6,2%
7. Erste 1,367 4,8%
8. Eurobank 1,337 4,7%
9. Banka Postanska Stedionica 1,186 4,2%
10. Vojvodjanska banka 1,036 3,6%
22,303 78,4%

Source: National Bank of Serbia

The Serbian market, like many other surrounding markets, cannot compete with the profitability of other regions in the world. We see this as the main reason for Société Générale ’s announced departure from Serbia, Albania, Montenegro, Macedonia, and Moldova. The same banking group has also pulled out of the Croatian market last year.

Is The Market Size The Most Important For The Bank?

The main reason for the presence of foreign banks in the domestic market is, of course, profit. Others are: political, economic and to some extent historical relations with the banks’ countries of origin. Among the European banks, the Austrian and Italian ones have the greatest presence in Serbia. Hungarian OTP and Turkish Halk bank are showing the significant interest is showing. They both possess an understanding of the Serbian market’s idiosyncrasies. The position of Société Générale and Crédit Agricole on the Serbian market is not relevant considering their influence on the global market. Société Générale ’s good performance in Serbia is not material in the context of its global business.

There are often major discrepancies between the performance of foreign banks in Serbia and abroad. Raiffeisen is achieving excellent results in Serbia despite the considerable losses that its group suffered in other markets in previous years. Intesa also provides an interesting example. Being the top bank in Serbia despite operating in complicated economic conditions at home. Indeed, Italy finds itself at the tail end of the EU’s projected GDP growth rates for 2018 (1.5%). At the end of 2017 Italy had the largest consolidated public debt in the EU, the highest amount of non-performing loans in the Eurozone (approx.200 billion euros), less than 60% of Italians support the euro, and their newly-formed government’s stance on their future within the EU is less than clear. In contrast, analysts expect a strengthening of the French economy. But, the electoral victory of Emmanuel Macron over the populists is just a beginning.

The results of foreign banks in Serbia cannot be substantial to their global business operations. Yet, this does not diminish the significance of the banking sector’s output for Serbian industry and economic development.

The Serbian banking market, in which a total of 29 banks operate, remains fragmented. At the end of 2017, the ten biggest banks held 78.4% of the total market share, with only six holding a share of over 5%. According to this index, Société Générale made the greatest stride. It increased its market share from 7.3% in 2016 to 8.5% in 2017, overtaking Raiffeisen bank’ fourth place. A change in the market also occurred in the seventh position, where Erste bank (4.8%) outran Eurobank (4.7%).

In 2017 the total assets of the banking sector increased from EUR 26.2 billion in 2016 to EUR 28.4 billion. Net loans grew from EUR 15.9 billion to EUR 17.8 billion. Deposits also advanced, albeit at a slower rate – from EUR 17.8 billion to EUR 18.8 billion. The number of employees grew from 23,832 to 24,745 (with Intesa employing the greatest number at the end of 2017 the total of 2,937).

The Serbian banking sector’s profitability is satisfactory and shows a positive trend. In 2017 sector-wide pre-tax profit was EUR 566.1 million, compared to EUR 173 million for the same period in 2016. The main reason for this difference are loan loss provisions – EUR 61.3 million in 2017 vs. EUR 329.7 million in 2016. The market for non-performing loans of legal entities was particularly dynamic in the last two years. It triggered a new wave of activity in financial markets. Price of secured receivables is around 10% – 15% of their nominal value and price of unsecured receivables around 5%. Still, some cases significantly deviate from these average values. The net interest income fell in 2016 vs. 2017, but the result for both periods was approximately the same: EUR 1 billion vs. EUR 997 million. The continuing trend of low-interest rates was partially compensated by revenues from commissions. These grew noticeably on the year-to-year level from EUR 286,5 million in 2016 to EUR 310.2 million in 2017. Intesa is by far most successful (EUR 54.2 million) in this category, followed by Komercijalna bank (EUR 41.9 million) and Raiffeisen (EUR 31.4 million).

Annual operating expenses increased for the whole banking sector by approx. EUR 10 million, but the difference in employee-related expenses is minor. It is noteworthy that the cost/income ratio (CIR) at the sector-level dropped from 64.8% (2016) to 59.9% (2017). AIK bank has by far the lowest CIR in the sector (24.6%).

Major challenges affecting the global banking industry are clients’ increased expectations of the service quality, regulatory changes, and technological progress. These equally impact the operation of banks in the Serbian market. In addition, Serbian market is noticeably fragmented. For these reasons, future developments are very hard to predict. Industry leaders are creating client’ needs. Industry followers set clients’ needs as a top priority in their business strategies. Banks are adjusting to this trend a bit slower. Yet, pressure from new technologies is pushing banks to recognize this inevitable trend. There is less and less guaranteed market share for banks with the conventional approach.

Regulatory changes in 2018 are significant for banking in Europe. The most important will be the adoption and implementation of new rules required by IFRS 9, Basel 4 and MiFID 2. Preparations have begun on schedule for IFRS 9. In short, it requires from banks to book expected losses earlier. Yet, opinions differ about the effects that Basel 4, whose aim was to round off the reforms envisaged by Basel 3, will have. Some people insist that Basel 4 amounts to a new set of reforms. Requirements for an increase of capital are substantial and that is why some think they shall be treated separately from Basel 3. The application of MiFID 2 began this year and requires from investment banks to present their expenses in a more transparent manner. Serbia got an invitation to prepare a negotiation position for chapter 9 – Financial Services as a part of its accession talks with the EU. The opening is expected this year. The anticipated outcome of this harmonization includes a stable and integrated financial system, a greater variety of services on the market and a greater security for users of financial services.

In terms of technological challenges, the banking sector is expected to have colossal investments

These challenges include artificial intelligence, blockchain technology as well as alternative financial institutions. There is an urgent need to advance in: decision-making processes (risk-taking) in real time, efficient processing of big data, security of information systems and data protection. Serbian banks are at the beginning of these developments and it is too early to give an estimate of the future pace. Aside from the aforementioned trends, the banking business in Serbia craves for more intensive consolidation. Management changes in Komercijalna bank last year shall push its privatization process forward. Rumor has it that Erste bank and Direktna bank are potentially interested bidders. There is also speculation that OTP bank has shown serious interest in the possible sale of Société Générale in Serbia. In 2017 OTP took over the Croatian Splitska bank as well as the Serbian Vojvodjanska bank. AIK bank, which has already acquired Alpha bank, is determined to expand its activities throughout the region. The main evidence is its purchase of shares in Slovenia’s Gorenjska bank. This process is not finished, but it represents a promising step for the Serbian banking market. Banka Postanska Stedionica (hereinafter: BPS) has taken over the assets of Jugobanka in Kosovska Mitrovica in the 1Q of 2018. In the same period, BPS took over several non-performing loan portfolios. Currently, BPS is in a process of restructuring supported by the World Bank. If this process succeeds, BPS could become one of the most valuable banks in the domestic market. Yet, the state so far did not prove itself as a good manager, but let’s hope for an exception to the rule.

There is more news on the horizon:  an unofficial announcement of a possible sale of Addiko bank, the news from Slovenia about the sale of NLB bank are consistent and becoming official. With Deutsche Bank as its privatization advisor, NLB is under a strong pressure from EU to move forward with the process. Following its acquisition of the Findomestic bank, Direktna bank plans to grow through acquisitions. Czech Expo bank entered the Serbian banking market in 2017 by acquiring Marfin bank.

These events might suggest that the Serbian banking market is in its full swing. Still, many of the important questions remain unanswered. For instance, will Crédit Agricole maintain its current level of business in Serbia, or will expand its business by capitalizing its global position, or alternatively, follow BNP Paribas and possibly Société Générale and decide to leave this market? How will Russian banks, heavily affected by sanctions, manage their business operations in Serbia in the future? To what extent will the Bank of China , Halkbank and Mirabank build up their activity in Serbia? What fate awaits banks with partial state ownership?

The list of questions is endless, but further development and competitiveness of the banking sector in Serbia depend on these and many other answers.

Contact:

Miloš Velimirović, Partner
milos.velimirovic@sog.rs
+381 63 555 156

OTHER NEWS

Welcome to our new and improved website!

With a fresh look and feel and intuitive design our new website and brand identity are designed for you, our visitors. The goal of the new website is to provide our current and prospective clients and other visitors with an improved user experience and an easier way...

read more

Filming in Serbia – Do You Need a Residence Permit?

Over the last few years, Serbia increased its efforts in supporting the film industry and encouraging foreign productions to shoot in Serbia. Therefore, it comes as no surprise that the Serbian Government doubled the budget for investment in the film industry in...

read more

We are looking to expand our Belgrade team!

We are looking to expand our Belgrade team with a SENIOR ASSOCIATE Qualifications: Experience in at least two of the following areas of practice: corporate and M&A, banking and finance, real estate, employment, dispute resolution and data protection and GDPR. Skills:...

read more

Let's connect

Let us know how we can help you and your business.

The Saga of the Serbian Banking Market Consolidation

July 18, 2018

Miloš Velimirović

Miloš Velimirović

Partner

Dunja Tašić

Dunja Tašić

Senior Associate

EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) comes into force on May 25th.

As many EU-based personal data handlers countdown the days until GDPR becomes effective hoping for the best, a burning question for non-EU personal data handlers remains – ‘does GDPR apply to my business or not’?

The stakes are pretty high, bearing in mind the draconian punishments GDPR prescribes for the breach of its provisions. That is why figuring out its extraterritorial application is crucial for non-EU entities.

As per GDPR, it is applicable:

1) on personal data controllers/processors established in EU, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the EU or not (territorial application);

2) on personal data controllers/processors not established in the EU, when processing the EU citizens’ personal data, as long as the processing activates relate to either

  • a) offering of goods or services, irrespective of whether a payment of the data subject is required;
  • b) monitoring behavior of EU citizens, as far as their behavior takes place within the EU (extraterritorial application).

The latter can cause a lot of confusion when it comes to its practical application. What does extraterritorial application of GDPR actually mean in practice and how can one easily ascertain whether it is subject to GDPR?

According to Article 29 Working Party GDPR General Information Document, in order for GDPR to be applicable to a non-EU entity, it is necessary for such entity to target EU citizens in a way that it offers them goods and services proactively, i.e. to monitor EU citizens’ behavior taking place in EU and making decisions based on such monitoring results.

As an example, if a Serbian company owns a website written in German language on which:

  • It offers goods with the possibility to order them using German language
  • Offers options of payment in EUR,
  • Accepts the offers from EU citizens and
  • Delivers the goods to them,

then, it is safe to conclude that such Serbian company targets Germans/Austrians, i.e. EU citizens, therefore, such company is subject to GDPR.

In order to consider a non-EU entity to be offering goods and services to EU citizens, it should be obvious that such entity targets the EU citizens in order to offer them goods and services. When it comes to monitoring of EU citizens’ behavior as the other case of extraterritorial application, monitoring of their behavior happening in EU needs to exist, meaning, a non-EU data handler needs to perform tracking and profiling of EU citizen, online, for example usage of web cookies and similar, so it can predict their behavior and make decisions based on such monitoring.

Therefore, it can be argued that simply processing EU citizens’ personal data without the elements of offering goods/services, targeting and monitoring, does not qualify a non-EU entity as a subject to GDPR, especially given that it is safe to assume that a vast number of non-EU entities may have EU citizen’s personal data in their databases for many other reasons.

Regardless of whether a Serbian company qualifies as a GDPR subject, it is hard to imagine any negative effects a company may have if it becomes GDPR-compliant, even it doesn’t have to. For example, a company can be considered a more desirable partner if it is GDPR –compliant, and for Serbian entities, GDPR compliance process pretty much means being compliant with the new Serbian Data Protection Act, which draft greatly relies on GDPR and is expected to come into force in the near future.

Note: This blogpost does not represent official legal advice given by SOG or its affiliates – it is a form of commentary regarding the GDPR interpretation of Article 29 Working Group.

For more legal information on applications of GDPR for your business, feel free to contact:

Miloš Velimirović, Partner
milos.velimirovic@sog.rs
+381 63 555 156

Dunja Tasić, Senior Associate
dunja.tasic@sog.rs
+381 69 3282 804

OTHER NEWS

Welcome to our new and improved website!

With a fresh look and feel and intuitive design our new website and brand identity are designed for you, our visitors. The goal of the new website is to provide our current and prospective clients and other visitors with an improved user experience and an easier way...

read more

Filming in Serbia – Do You Need a Residence Permit?

Over the last few years, Serbia increased its efforts in supporting the film industry and encouraging foreign productions to shoot in Serbia. Therefore, it comes as no surprise that the Serbian Government doubled the budget for investment in the film industry in...

read more

We are looking to expand our Belgrade team!

We are looking to expand our Belgrade team with a SENIOR ASSOCIATE Qualifications: Experience in at least two of the following areas of practice: corporate and M&A, banking and finance, real estate, employment, dispute resolution and data protection and GDPR. Skills:...

read more

Let's connect

Let us know how we can help you and your business.